Disciplinary Inquiries

Disciplinary Inquiries to be held by the Board

Date: 1 March 2012 (Thursday)
Time: 2 :15 p.m.
Venue: Conference Room (Room 76), 17/F, Wu Chung House, 213 Queen's Road East, Wan Chai, Hong Kong.

Top


Board Decisions at the Disciplinary Inquiries

The Physiotherapists Board decided at its 1 March 2010 meeting to publish in the Board's website the Board's decisions made at disciplinary inquiries conducted after 1 March 2010 where the registered physiotherapist is found guilty of disciplinary offence. The following information relating to the case will be published -

  • The disciplinary charge(s) of the case;
  • The disciplinary sanctions administered; and
  • The month and year of the Board's order.

No personal data of the registered physiotherapist(s) concerned will be published.

Details of the Board’s decisions made for the inquiries held by the Board on or after 1 March 2010 are shown as below -

Month/Year Nature of the disciplinary charge Board's order
March 2010

The respondent sanctioned, acquiesced in or failed to take adequate steps to prevent the use of an unapproved title 'X醫生應診' in name card in that it might mislead the public into believing that the registered physiotherapist concerned was a medical practitioner

Warning letter issued
July 2010

The respondent failed to manage the case of X ("the complainant") in an appropriate professional manner in that on 20 February 2009, he delegated the task of heat treatment through application of electrical hot pack to the back of the complainant, to whom he owed a duty of care and for whose treatment he was responsible, to a therapist called 'Y', he and/or Y allowed the complainant to sleep throughout the course of the said heat treatment for around one hour causing burns on her back

Warning letter issued
August 2010

The respondent was convicted on 1 April 2008 of two counts of Conspiracy to Defraud, which is an offence in Common Law and punishable with imprisonment under section 159C(6) of the Crimes Ordinance, Chapter 200, Laws of Hong Kong.

The respondent's name was removed from the register of physiotherapists for 30 days and the order was published in the HKSAR Government Gazette
October 2010

The respondent was convicted at the Tsuen Wan Magistrates' Courts in Hong Kong on 29 May 2008 of two counts of an offence punishable with imprisonment, namely Conspiracy to defraud, contrary to Common Law and punishable under section 159C and 159C(6) of the Crimes Ordinance, Chapter 200, Laws of Hong Kong.

The respondent's name was removed from the register of physiotherapists for 60 days and the order was published in the HKSAR Government Gazette

March 2011

The respondent used unapproved and misleading descriptive wording ‘運動專科註冊物理治療師’ in the leaflet for promoting public talks on knee injury and low back pain in that it might cause a reader to misconceive that he was an expert in ‘運動專科’ when there was and still is not a specialist registration as such under Supplementary Medical Professions Ordinance, Cap. 359, and Physiotherapists (Regulation and Disciplinary Procedure) Regulation, Cap. 359J, Laws of Hong Kong. 

Warning letter issued
June 2011

(a) Canvassing and advertising in magazine - sanctioned, acquiesced in or failed to take adequate steps to prevent the publication in a health magazine articles (i) which referred readers to the website and/or telephone number of a company providing physiotherapy service (“the Company”) and (ii) along with an advertisement of the Company showing information as to its charge for certain type of treatment; and by associating with the Company with a financial and/or professional relationship which so conducted itself, such conduct amounts to canvassing.

(b) Advertising and use of unapproved descriptions - sanctioned, acquiesced in or failed to take adequate steps to prevent the publication of (i) an article promoting the scope of services of the Company and (ii) unapproved qualifications and descriptions in a website.  

Warning letter issued

 

Top

Last Update: